Comments on: How We Know Modern Warfare 3′s Multiplayer Will Either Be Great Or Broken http://gamrzz.com/article/how-we-know-modern-warfare-3s-multiplayer-will-either-be-great-or-broken/ All The Latest News, Screenshots And Videos Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:05:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: admin http://gamrzz.com/article/how-we-know-modern-warfare-3s-multiplayer-will-either-be-great-or-broken/#comment-67 admin Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:57:32 +0000 http://gamrzz.com/?p=788#comment-67 now this is a comment, thanks very much for reading and saying your opinion :D now this is a comment, thanks very much for reading and saying your opinion :D

]]> By: Uncle Bing http://gamrzz.com/article/how-we-know-modern-warfare-3s-multiplayer-will-either-be-great-or-broken/#comment-65 Uncle Bing Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:00:37 +0000 http://gamrzz.com/?p=788#comment-65 I am a fairly naive person. This is what I think. Activision, Infinity Ward and the rest of the crew behind MW3 have much to prove. They must strike back against a lot of people who believe that IW was considerably weakened after many of the key personnel left the company for Respawn Entertainment. They simply must deliver a great game. They must release a game that is both impressive and stripped of errors. Activision knows this. And this is what they will do. Still just as naive ... Activision learned a valuable lesson after they released Black Ops with a multiplayer filled with errors. They do not make such a mistake again. Equally naive ... Activision is being whipped on the back by an aggressive EA. Activison knows EA and Dice will deliver a brilliant Battlefield 3. Activision hates losing. That's why they do not dare to send out a bad game. They will not risk being laughed at by the gaming community, which praises EA and BF3 at the same time. Activision wants to be the king of the hill. They have no plans to leave that hill for EA and a bunch of Swedes. And... as you write in the article: New heads may think better and more creative than older heads. All above can be summarized as follows: MW3 will be a great game. Better than both MW2 and BLOPS, even. I am of course prepared to eat every word I've written, naive as I am. ;) I am a fairly naive person. This is what I think.

Activision, Infinity Ward and the rest of the crew behind MW3 have much to prove. They must strike back against a lot of people who believe that IW was considerably weakened after many of the key personnel left the company for Respawn Entertainment. They simply must deliver a great game. They must release a game that is both impressive and stripped of errors. Activision knows this. And this is what they will do.

Still just as naive … Activision learned a valuable lesson after they released Black Ops with a multiplayer filled with errors. They do not make such a mistake again.

Equally naive … Activision is being whipped on the back by an aggressive EA. Activison knows EA and Dice will deliver a brilliant Battlefield 3. Activision hates losing. That’s why they do not dare to send out a bad game. They will not risk being laughed at by the gaming community, which praises EA and BF3 at the same time. Activision wants to be the king of the hill. They have no plans to leave that hill for EA and a bunch of Swedes.

And… as you write in the article: New heads may think better and more creative than older heads.

All above can be summarized as follows: MW3 will be a great game. Better than both MW2 and BLOPS, even. I am of course prepared to eat every word I’ve written, naive as I am. ;)

]]>